Legal Opinion
Agrolinz Inc v. Micro Flo Co
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 20, 2000No. 98-6015Published
1Opinion of the Court
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION 8 Agrolinz, Inc., et al. v. Micro Flo Co. No. 98-6015 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 ELECTRONIC CITATION:
2000 FED App. 0030P (6th Cir.)
File Name: 00a0030p.06 trial court err in concluding that the parties did not intend to preclude Micro Flo from pursuing its outstanding reserved claims against Agrolinz in arbitration. Accordingly, the trial court’s disposition is affirmed for the reasons set forth UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS herein. FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ ; AGROLINZ, INC. and AGROLINZ MELAMIN, G.M.B.H., No. 98-6015…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wilton E. Heyliger v. State University and Community College System of Tennessee, Allen Spritzer and John SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- North Shore Realty Corporation v. GallaherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
- Hassenteufel v. Howard JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Long v. Kirby-SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1956
- Apstein v. Tower Investments of Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989