Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1895No. 562PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of Wharton. Tried below before Hon. T. S. Reese. This apjieal is from a judgment final for §300 on a forfeited recognizance. All that is necessary to be stated will be found in the opinion below'.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment final on a forfeited recognizance. This recognizance is as follows, to-wit (after stat ing style and number of the cause): “Now, on this day, came into open court Dabney Smith, and Bat Smith, R. F. Armstrong, J. Phillips, Edwin Harris j R. M. Brown, and R. B. Houston, and entered into a recognizance in words and figures substantially as follows, to-wit: ‘We acknowledge ourselves jointly 'and severally to owe and be indebted unto the State of Texas in the penal sum of three hundred dollars (§300.00), to be levied of our goods and chattels, lands…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zobel v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API