Legal Opinion

Long v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 2004PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

President Judge COLINS.

Natrona Long (Claimant) petitions for review from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) granting Claimant’s claim petition for a closed period and suspending benefits thereafter pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act. 1 We affirm.

On July 22, 1999 Claimant filed two petitions, a claim petition in which she alleged that she sustained a work-related injury on April 10, 1999 and a penalty petition alleging that Integrated Health Service, Inc. (Employer) violated Sections…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Andracki v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Crenshaw v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Carpentertown Coal & Coke Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Degraw v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Calex, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Central Dauphin School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Bandru v. Fawzen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2015
  5. Brand Energy Services, LLC, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America and Broadspire v. WCAB (Arnao)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API