Legal Opinion

Stramaglia v. Marubeni American Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 16, 1990No. 89-1654PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POLEN, Judge.

We do not have jurisdiction in this appeal, nor is the record presented sufficient to overturn the trial court’s decision.

The order being reviewed provides that the plaintiff’s motion for contempt is granted but that a hearing on sanctions shall be set for a later date. There is no order imposing sanctions in the record. The appellant has not even been ordered to answer the interrogatories in question. The order sought to be reviewed is not reviewable as a final order because it is not final in form and also because the judicial labor has not ended on the contempt issue. See…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Russell v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nathanson v. RishykoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Sell v. SellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API