Ficklin v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
MICKLE, Judge.
The state charged the. appellant with sexual battery pursuant to section 794.011, Florida Statutes (1993), and the jury found him guilty as charged. As grounds for reversal, the appellant contends that the trial court erred 1) by granting the state’s motion in *709limine that limited the defense’s ability to cross-examine the victim; 2) by giving the jury a modified charge (expressly approved by defense counsel) that allegedly differed significantly from the standard charge in Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896); and 3) by imposing a guidelines…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Jent v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Dufour v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- Pacifico v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kopson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013