Legal Opinion

State v. Schmidt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 29, 1985No. 85-27PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

474 So.2d 899 (1985)

In re STATE

v.

Melinda Marie SCHMIDT.

Edward BRINSON and William Stephen Borden, Appellants,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-27.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 29, 1985.

Nancy Y. Smith and Devo A. Heller of Brinson, Smith, Heller & Smith, P.A., Kissimmee, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND REHEARING EN BANC

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellee's motion for rehearing en banc is denied. We grant the motion for clarification, withdraw the prior…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Hoyas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Wells v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. George v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Soven v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API