Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Tom J. Gialde v. Time, Inc., Time, Inc. v. Honorable John W. Oliver, Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 20, 1973No. 72-1776, 73-1030Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHeaney, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority opinion insofar as it holds that the District Court’s order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment is not appealable. I would hold, however, that the District Court’s order requiring the disclosure of the names of anonymous and confidential news sources is subject to immediate review by mandamus.

In Cervantes v. Time, Inc., 464 F.2d 986 (8th Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 409 U. S. 1125, 93 S.Ct. 939, 35 L.Ed.2d 257 (1973), we held that the use of confidential news sources by the press is protected by the First Amendment — that “to compel a newsman to breach a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perlman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Alfonso J. Cervantes v. Time, Inc., and Denny WalshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  4. Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Honorable Bernard M. Decker, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Gray v. Gulf Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API