Legal Opinion

Sabatucci v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 2013No. SD 32143PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGary W. Lynch, P.J.

Peter Jason Sabatucci (“Movant”) appeals the denial of his Rule 24.0351 motion for post-conviction relief following an evi-dentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying relief because plea counsel was ineffective for not properly advising Movant regarding a motion for change of judge, and Movant was prejudiced as a result, in that had he known the identity of the new judge assigned, he would have chosen to remain with the judge who was originally assigned to his case. Finding that Movant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim was waived by his knowing and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Swallow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CHRISTOPHER ALLEN BORNEMAN, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Rice v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API