Legal Opinion

Village of Pelham v. New York State Board of Equalization & Assessment

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBookstein, J.

Respondent contends that petitioner has no status to institute and maintain this proceeding. Hence, it seems logical to dispose of that question first.

Prior to the abolition of the writ of certiorari under the Tax Law, by section 290 of the Tax Law, effective May 1, 1949, said section read in part as follows: “ Any person assessed upon *203any assessment-roll, claiming to be aggrieved by any assessment for property therein, may present to the supreme court a petition duly verified setting forth that the assessment is illegal * * * erroneous * * * or * * * unequal ”.

Under section 290 of the Tax…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . KeelerNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. People ex rel. Bingham Operating Corp. v. EyrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  3. People ex rel. Bingham Operating Corp. v. EyrichNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People Ex Rel. City of New York v. . VorisNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  5. People ex rel. City of New York v. ChapmanNew York Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. ParsonsNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Central School District No. 1 v. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. City of Mount Vernon v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Mott Haven Furniture Co. v. Finance AdministratorNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API