Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Grace Plaza of Great Neck, Inc. v. Elbaum

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1993Published

1Concurrence

Hancock, Jr., J.

(concurring). I concur with the result and with the majority opinion. Indeed, under New York’s "specific subjective intent” rule (see, Matter of Westchester County Med. Ctr. [O’Connor], 72 NY2d 517, 530-531), which the parties were bound to follow, no other outcome is possible. I write separately only to express again my personal conviction (see, O’Connor, supra, at 535-539 [Hancock, Jr., J., concurring]) that "the present New York rule — requiring a factual finding of the patient’s actual intent and precluding the exercise of judgment, in her best interests and on her behalf,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Westchester County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. In the Matter of HierMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  3. Elbaum v. Grace Plaza of Great Neck, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Grace Plaza of Great Neck, Inc. v. ElbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API