Legal Opinion

Schlott v. Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1912No. Appeal, No. 35Published

Appeal, No. 35, Oct. T., 1911, by plaintiff, ■ from order of C. P. Lancaster Co., Trust Book No. 21, page 445, dismissing petition for appointment of viewers in case of Anna Schlott v. Terre Hill Petition for appointment of viewers. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts. Error assigned was order dismissing petition for the appointment of viewers.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Head, J.,

The appellant filed her petition in the court of common *199pleas of Lancaster county alleging that she was a resident of the borough of Terre Hill in said county and the owner of a considerable lot of ground on the west side of Maple street in said borough; “that the said borough had enacted, ordained and surveyed and laid out and widened the said Maple street on the west side of the same where your petitioner’s property is situated and changed the street line and also changed or altered the grade of the said street so that the land of your petitioner has been taken and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klenke v. West Homestead BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Davis v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Bredin v. Pittsburg & Western RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API