Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Pierce

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2007No. 27585Published

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Judge.

The marriage of Kim (“Wife”) and James (“Husband”) Pierce was dissolved in 1998. 1 Husband was ordered to pay Wife $500 per month modifiable maintenance, plus $1,192 per month child support for the couple’s two children, which was later reduced to $976 for the remaining unemanci-pated child, Andrew.

After Husband was medically forced to retire, he moved to modify his maintenance and child support obligations in 2005. The court granted his motion, terminated Wife’s maintenance, and modified both parties’ child support obligations. 2 Wife’s appeal includes eleven claims of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gerecke v. GereckeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Leslie v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  3. Hughes v. HughesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Ethridge v. EthridgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Marriage of Katz v. KatzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API