Legal Opinion

People v. Hawkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 2003No. B156481PublishedCited by 7 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERREN, J.

Penal Code 1 section 2933.1 imposes a 15 percent limitation on the accrual of presentence and worktime credits for those convicted of a crime that is defined as a violent felony in section 667.5. Section 667.5, subdivision (c)(8) defines as a violent felony “[a]ny felony in which the defendant inflicts great bodily injury on any person other than an accomplice which has been charged and proved as provided for in Section 12022.7 . . . .” Here, we conclude that battery with serious bodily injury (§ 243, subd. (d)) cannot qualify as a violent felony under subdivision (c)(8) of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. SinohuiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. BeltranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. BruckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. OttersteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ArnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Al-Hamim v. Star Hearthstone, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Boultinghouse v. HallDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
  4. In re CabreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2023
  5. People v. Clayton CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API