Legal Opinion
Speller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 7, 1989No. 87-02917PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We affirm appellant’s convictions for burglary of a structure, grand theft, and possession of burglary tools. However, because the concurrent five-and-one-half-year sentences exceed the statutory maximum for each of the offenses, appellant must be resentenced.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991