Commonwealth v. Maguigan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentPapadakos, Justice
I must dissent. In this appeal by the Commonwealth (Appellant), it continues in its attempt to compel Holly Maguigan, Appellee, to respond to its speculative inquiries concerning the whereabouts of her client who failed to appear for a scheduled trial three years ago.
*135Appellee is an attorney who represented Carlos Aquino on charges of rape, statutory rape, corrupting the morals of a minor, indecent assault, and indecent exposure.
On April 7, 1983, Aquino did not appear for his trial on these charges. Later that day, the Commonwealth filed a Motion to Compel Appellee to disclose the address and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Alexander v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Estate of KofskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- In re Young's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Alexander v. QueenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.