Legal Opinion
McClafferty v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 8, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] At the conclusion of the plaintiff's case the defendants moved for a dismissal of the action and the Court, at that time, reserved its ruling on that motion and directed the defendants to proceed with their defense.
After both sides rested the defendants then moved for a directed verdict in favor of the defendants as against the plaintiff and the Court now has that motion before it for disposition.
The plaintiff has discontinued as to the second and third counts.
Th…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clyne v. HelmesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Grugan v. Shore Hotels Finance & Exchange Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Monohan v. BaimeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Colligan v. 680 Newark Avenue Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- La Freda v. WoodwardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grochowski v. StewartSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Russell-Stanley Corp. v. Plant Industries, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Mikrut v. PellowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961