Legal Opinion

Foster v. Wooley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 17, 1923No. 14121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

This was an action instituted in the district court of Tulsa county by J. B. Foster, pa'ní-if. aun n t James Wooley, sheriff of Tulsa county, and London & Lancashire Indemnity Company of America, a corporation, as surety on the official bond of the defendant Wooley as sheriff.

The plaintiff in his petition sets forth the fact that James Wooley was the duly e'eot-ed, qualified, and acting sheriff of Tulsa county, and that the defendant London & Lancashire Indemnity Company of America was surety on the official bond of the said Wooley; that the plaintiff had recovered judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Allison v. BryanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Davis & Son v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Nutt v. DavisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API