Legal Opinion

Crews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 19, 1992No. 91-03212PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We agree with the Fourth District Court of Appeal that the 1989 amendments to the habitual offender statute were not invalid as violative of the one subject provision of the Florida Constitution. McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). Contra, Johnson v. State, 589 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). That disposes of appellant’s first point.

Appellant’s only other point is that his classification as a habitual violent felony offender was a violation of due process and double jeopardy principles because the instant crime of which he was convicted (possession of a firearm by a convicted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. McCall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Griffiths v. Barnett Bank of NaplesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Crews v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API