Legal Opinion
Perrimond v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 12, 1884No. 12906PublishedCited by 7 opinions
The Reporters’ statement of the case: This action the claimant brought by the voluntary filing of his petition. The demand was for mileage and the case turned entirely upon an order of Rear-Admiral Bryson, which will be found in the opinion of the court. The decision not being ap-pealable, no findings of fact were filed.
1Opinion of the CourtNott, J.
The Act 30th June, 1876 (19 Stat. L., p. 65, ch. 157), allowed mileage to officers of the Navy u while engaged on public business.” The only evidence which the claimant; has introduced to show that, while traveling from Montevideo, Uruguay, to Sandy Point, Strait of Magellan, in December, 1880, he was on public business is the following order:
“Flagship Shenandoah, 2d rate,
“ Montevideo, Uruguay, December 21 st, 1880.
“ Sir : Take passage in the first steamer bound to Sandy Point, Strait of Magellan, at your own expense, and rejoin the Marion. On your arrival on board make such statement as you…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Day v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Elmore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
- Townsend v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1887
- Crosby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1887
- Lemly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.