Legal Opinion

Cape Ann Land Development Corp. v. City of Gloucester

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 27, 1976PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The plaintiff (Cape Ann) is the owner of fourteen and one-half acres of land (locus) adjacent to Route 128 in Gloucester (city) on which it has operated an open air motion picture theatre for approximately twenty years and on which it now wishes to construct a shopping center. In December, 1972, Cape Ann submitted a “perimeter plan” of the locus to the Gloucester planning board, requesting that the plan be endorsed “subdivision approval not required.” See G. L. c. 41, § 81P. A city clerk’s certificate concerning the failure of the planning board to act seasonably, equivalent in effect to such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Robert A. Pauls, Etc. v. The Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  3. New England Power Company v. Asiatic Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
  4. Belfer v. Building Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  5. M. DeMatteo Construction Co. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. SCIT, Inc. v. Planning Board of BraintreeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Newbury Junior College v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Smalley v. Planning Board of HarwichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Hunters Brook Realty Corp. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Heritage Park Development Corp. v. Town of SouthbridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API