Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

PROM KNOX. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Knox County. Joseph W. Sneed, J.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlister, J.

This is a suit to recover damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff’s intestate, J. W. Lebow, on January 15, 1897, was run over and killed by one of defendant’s trains. The suit of’the administrator was originally brought July 8, 1897, in the Circuit Court of Knox County, to recover $20,000 damages. The declaration was filed November 15, 1897, alleging that complainant, as administrator, brought the suit for the benefit of Mariah Lebow, the mother of deceased, as his next of kin and distributee. Thereupon the defendant-company, on the same day, removed the cause, on the ground of nonresidence,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Whaley v. CatlettTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Manchester v. EricssonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Steinman v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1917
  2. Motsenbocker v. Shawnee Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Wells v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Ross v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Reed v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API