Legal Opinion

Shearman v. Iroquois Hotel & Apartment Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 30, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District. Replevin by Milched Shearman against the Iroquois Hotel & Apartment Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

The plaintiff’s furniture was in the apartments which were in the possession of her husband by virtue of a formal lease in writing executed and delivered to him by the defendant. This lease is for a. term of one year, the rent being payable monthly in advance, and has all the covenants usually contained in a lease of premises in an apartment house, subject, however, to certain rules which the landlord has imposed as to the use of the premises. In this lease plaintiff’s husband is designated as the tenant, and the defendant as the landlord. By the terms of the lease the absolute right of use…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
  2. Porter v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Cromwell v. StephensNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1867
  4. Barnett v. WalkerNew York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marden v. RadfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Mathews v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  3. Alsberg v. Lucerne Hotel Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API