Legal Opinion

Bridger v. Lake

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1995No. 94-404Published

1Opinion of the Court

896 P.2d 406 (1995)

William E. BRIDGER and Mary A. Bridger, Plaintiffs and Respondents, and

Roger C. Todd, Judith N. Todd and Jean L. Todd, Robert Evans, Glen M. Hargrove, Betty Rae Hargrove, Michael Wold, Lorenia M. Wold, and Earl Wesley Hargrove, Plaintiffs by Intervention and Respondents,

v.

Jackson L. LAKE, Jr., Lynne M. Blackburn, a/k/a Lynn M. McDonald, Burlington Northern Railroad Company, a Delaware corporation, Montana Rail Link, Inc., a Montana corporation, Defendants, and

The State of Montana, Alice Mina Lake, The Personal Representative of the Estate of John Ludwell Lake, Deceased, and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Goodgion v. LatimerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  2. Titeca v. State Ex Rel. Department of Fish, Wildlife, & ParksMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Shalimar Ass'n v. D.O.C. Enterprises, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Baertsch v. County of Lewis and ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bridger v. LakeMontana Supreme Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API