Legal Opinion

Harden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 1995No. 94-818PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Judge.

Andrew Harden appeals his guidelines sentence, contending that it should be reduced because the trial court erred by assessing legal constraint points on his scoresheet. We quash the sentence and remand for resen-tencing because Harden was not under “legal constraint” for sentencing guidelines purposes.

Previous to the commission of the instant offenses, Harden was adjudicated guilty of obtaining property by worthless check. The order of disposition on that earlier offense required him to pay restitution and costs within 60 days. Although Harden was required to pay restitution,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pierre v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API