Legal Opinion

State v. Greenhill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1984No. 8314SC872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the action of the trial court in permitting the State “to question the defendant about the details of prior convictions for similar assaults.” He contends that the State’s questions “tended to suggest that the defendant was predisposed to commit” offenses similar to that with which he was charged.

The law is well-settled that any witness, including the defendant in a criminal case, may be cross-examined for impeachment purposes as to previous convictions. State v. Williams, 279 N.C. 663, 185 S.E. 2d 174 (1971). If the witness admits the conviction, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. BryantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RathboneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. OutlawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API