Legal Opinion · Dissent

Metropolitan Development Commission v. Villages, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1984No. 2-783A256Published

1DissentRatliff, Judge

I dissent. The contemplated use of the residence in question by The Villages as a group home for abused, abandoned, and neglected children in a simulated family environment constitutes a single-family dwelling within the restrictions of the zoning ordinance. Although the courts of Indiana have not had occasion to deal with this problem, that the proposed use meets the definition of single-family residence is clearly established by decisions from our sister states. Hessling v. City of Broomfield, (1977) 193 Colo. 124, 563 P.2d 12; Hamner v. Best, (1983) Ky.App., 656 S.W.2d 253; Group House of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of White Plains v. FerraioliNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Saunders v. Clark County Zoning DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Group House of Port Washington, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Hessling v. City of BroomfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Bellarmine Hills Ass'n v. Residential Systems Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API