Legal Opinion

Parrette v. Citizens' Casualty Co. of N.Y.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 10, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Perskie, J.

The single question requiring decision in this cause is whether a unilateral or a mutual mistake was committed in the writing of the insurance policy covering complainant’s taxicabs.

The facts which give rise to the stated question are free from substantial dispute.

Anthony Parrette, appellant here and complainant below, who sought reformation of the policy in question, was engaged in the taxicab business in Plainfield, New Jersey. He owned three Packard cars, hereafter referred to as cars A, B and C, which he used as taxicabs. Pursuant to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Giammares v. Allemannia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
  2. Gross v. YeskelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  3. Koch v. Commonwealth InsuranceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Dein-Bacher, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Motor Club of America Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  2. Illinois National Insurance v. Wyndham Worldwide Operations, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  3. Esoldi v. EsoldiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
  4. Heake v. Atlantic Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Toth v. VazquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API