State v. Lussier

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

Appellant State of Minnesota challenges the district court’s order granting respondent Joshua William Lussier’s motion to suppress evidence of the charged crimes of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and kidnapping. Because the district court erred in determining that exigent circumstances did not justify a warrantless entry and search of respondent’s residence and because respondent’s squad-ear statement was therefore not suppressible as the fruit of an unconstitutional search, we reverse in part and remand. But because the warrantless sexual-assault (SARS) examination…