Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bennett v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 29, 2000No. 0925982Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

COLEMAN, Judge,

with whom BENTON and ELDER, JJ., join, dissenting, in part, and concurring, in part.

A panel of this Court reversed the defendant’s conviction for a second or subsequent offense of driving while intoxicated because the trial court erroneously ruled that the jury, rather than the trial judge, had to decide whether the defendant was “physically unable to submit to the breath test” and thereby entitled to a blood test as provided by Code § 18.2-268.2(B). See Bennett v. Commonwealth, 31 Va.App. 30, 520 S.E.2d 845 (1999). In support of its decision reversing the trial court, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. MullinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. Mullins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  3. Rabeiro v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
  4. Lamay v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
  5. Bennett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API