Legal Opinion
Harris v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 20, 1978No. 11645PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Chief Judge:
Convicted of grand larceny after a bench trial on a stipulated record, appellant contends on appeal that the trial court committed reversible error in denying his motion to suppress tangible evidence. Finding no error, we affirm.
The facts are fairly stated in the government’s brief on appeal and can be paraphrased therefrom as follows. 1 On June 21, 1976, at approximately 1:20 a. m., Metropolitan Police Officers Martha Clark and Dennis E. Larman were patrolling in a police cruiser in the 1100 block of 20th Street, Northwest. Officers Clark and Larman observed a man, later…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Robert S. Wylie, A/K/A Bobby S. WylieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Stephenson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Barts v. JoynerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. BarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Barts v. JoynerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- District of Columbia v. M.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Wilkerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.