In re the Arbitration between Penco Fabrics, Inc. & Louis Bogopulsky, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment unanimously modified so as to provide that interest shall be added to the award only from December 11, 1954, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The question whether interest was to be allowed on the award from the date when payment of the invoices was found to be due was for the arbitrators to determine. In absence of such an allowance by the arbitrators, the court, on respondent’s motion to confirm the award, was powerless to award interest from the date of breach. The mere fact that the award was silent on the question did not mean that the arbitrators did not…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Arbitration between East India Trading Co. & HalariAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Gruberg & Cortell Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Meehan v. Nassau Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. RosenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Dermigny v. HarperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re the Arbitration between Rothermel & Fidelity & Guarantee Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.