Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bartholomey v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 4, 1972No. [No. 106, September Term, 1970.] [No. 386, September Term, 1971.] [Misc. No. 2, September Term, 1972.] [Misc. No. 3, September Term, 1972.]Published

September Term, 1970.] September Term, 1971.] September Term, 1972.] September Term, 1972.]

1DissentSmith, J.

I concur in the dissent of Judge Barnes, but I would add a few words of my own.

In a matter of constitutional proportions I do not think we should be placed in the position of having to guess at the holding of the highest Court in the land. In the absence of a clear cut holding from the Supreme Court of the United States on the death penalty arising from a state where, as in Maryland, the penalty is specified not by a jury, but by a judge or judges, and arising under circumstances approaching our cases, guessing is exactly what we are doing.

The majority in their opinion confirm the analysis of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. State v. DickersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Gilmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. Brice v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API