Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

One of the grounds of the attorney general’s motion is that a writ of error does not lie to review the order of the trial court in which it denied the motion of plaintiffs in error, hereafter referred to as “defendants,” for an injunction against the clerk of the circuit court and the sheriff because it is not in the nature of a final judgment. When this case was reached upon the assignment, the court was of the opinion that the writ did not lie and that the court was powerless to review the proceedings had on the petition of the defendants after judgment, and the writ was ordered dismissed.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCaslin v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. MeenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Jackson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Ogden v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lovesee v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sparkman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Babbitt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. RybackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Dore v. StoltzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. KoopmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API