Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. . Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentMerrimon, C. J.

The action was brought in the name of Larkin Smith, by his next friends, A. L. Ferrell and others, appointed by the court. The purpose of the action was to set aside a prior power of attorney executed by Larkin Smith to the defendant, Charles H. Smith, by reason of mental incapacity, and to have a receiver appointed for his estate. After the service of the summons on Charles H. Smith, to wit, on 26 February, 1889, Larkin Smith executed a power of attorney to Messrs. Fuller Snow and Batchelor Devereux, attorneys, empowering and directing them to dismiss the said action.

When the case was called…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Lowe v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. State v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Tate v. . MottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Voorheis v. BlantonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1898
  2. Stark v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Voorhees, Miller & Co. v. BlantonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API