Legal Opinion
Najib A Hodge v. NAPA Genuine Auto Parts
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 18, 2026No. 2:26-cv-03101Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Najib A Hodge, No. CV-26-03101-PHX-JAT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 NAPA Genuine Auto Parts, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment as to NAPA 16 Genuine Auto Parts (Doc. 32). The Court now rules. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 On September 10, 2025, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint (Doc. 12) against 19 Defendants NAPA Genuine Auto Parts (“NAPA”) and DoorDash, Inc. (“DoorDash”). 20 After the Court compelled arbitration as to Plaintiff’s claims against DoorDash and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.