County of Buncombe v. Arbogast

Stacy, 0. J.

This case in all of its essential features is controlled by the decision in Harnett County v. Reardon, 203 N. C., 267, 165 S. E., 701. Indeed, the judgment might well be affirmed on authority of the Harnett County case, without more, but there are other considerations appearing on the present record which tend to support the judgment of vacation:

1. In the first place, it should be observed that no deed has been executed by the commissioner for said property, as was the case, e. g., in Orange County v. Wilson, 202 N. C., 424, 163 S. E., 113, and it does not appear that the price…