Legal Opinion
Tindall ex rel. Tindall v. United States
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided June 15, 1987No. GC 87-5-D-0Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff has brought the instant action against the defendant asserting that the defendant is liable for injuries that the plaintiff sustained when an explosive device with which the plaintiff was playing exploded in his hand. The plaintiff asserts that the United States should be held liable for his injuries because the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Fire Arms distributed the explosive device without placing warnings on the device.
Title 40 of the United States Code § 304h provides:
In the event that any property seized by any agency is or has…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alex Carl Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.