Legal Opinion

Brierley v. Anaconda Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 26, 1973No. 2 CA-CIV 1391PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

A judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the appellee, defendant below, in a wrongful death action instituted by appellant, plaintiff below, is the subject of this appeal. The major thrust of plaintiff’s attack is directed to certain jury instructions either given or refused.1

Briefly, the facts are as follows. On January 22, 1971, plaintiff’s decedent, a journeyman ironworker, was an employee of the Chapman-Dyer Steel Manufacturing *8Company, an independent contractor which had undertaken to construct .and install a dust collector system in Anaconda’s secondary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hanson v. Town & Country Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Cummings v. PraterArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Peterson v. WT Rawleigh CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Bonn v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brierley v. Anaconda CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Johnson v. Tucson Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. Purchase v. MARDIAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Purchase v. MARDIAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API