Mayor of New York v. Parker Vein Steamship Co.
The Superior Court of New York City
Appeal from a judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.—Woodruff, J.
—We are of opinion that the facts alleged in the defendants’ answer are not available to the defendants as a counter-claim within the meaning of that term, as employed and defined in the Code; and therefore, whether they constitute a cause of action in favor of the Parker Vein Steamship Company or not, they cannot be used to defeat the plaintiffs’ recovery herein.
The plaintiffs’ action is brought upon a penal bond, signed and sealed by all of the defendants, conditioned for the payment of the rent which, in a certain lease, was covenanted by the Parker Vein Steamship…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walter v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Xenia Branch of State Bank of Ohio v. LeeThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858
- Gleason v. MoenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
- Bogardus v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilkerson v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Ransom v. WetmoreNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Chamboret v. CagneyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1870
- Rhinelander v. MartinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889
- Chamboret v. CagneyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.