Legal Opinion

Mayor of New York v. Parker Vein Steamship Co.

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided June 15, 1861PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.—Woodruff, J.

—We are of opinion that the facts alleged in the defendants’ answer are not available to the defendants as a counter-claim within the meaning of that term, as employed and defined in the Code; and therefore, whether they constitute a cause of action in favor of the Parker Vein Steamship Company or not, they cannot be used to defeat the plaintiffs’ recovery herein.

The plaintiffs’ action is brought upon a penal bond, signed and sealed by all of the defendants, conditioned for the payment of the rent which, in a certain lease, was covenanted by the Parker Vein Steamship…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walter v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Xenia Branch of State Bank of Ohio v. LeeThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858
  3. Gleason v. MoenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
  4. Bogardus v. ParkerNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  2. Ransom v. WetmoreNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Chamboret v. CagneyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1870
  4. Rhinelander v. MartinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889
  5. Chamboret v. CagneyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API