Legal Opinion

Moore v. Ellis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1894PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire county: ~W. F. Bailey, Circuit Judge. This is an action to recover the amount due -upon two promissory notes executed by the defendant to one F. A. Moore.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire county: ~W. F. Bailey, Circuit Judge. This is an action to recover the amount due -upon two promissory notes executed by the defendant to one F. A. Moore. There was no defense against the notes, but the answer set up a counterclaim for services rendered by the defendant to F. A. Moore for $864.61. The verdict was for the plaintiff for the amount of the notes, less $52 allowed on the counterclaim; and judgment was for the plaintiff for that sum, less $29.60 remitted by the plaintiff. Judgment was for plaintiff for $49T.90, from which…

1Opinion of the CourtNewMAN, J.

The appellant alleges three errors for which the judgment should be reversed: (1) That he was entitled to a judgment on his counterclaim for want of a reply; (2) that on the evidence he was entitled to a much greater allowance on his counterclaim; (3) that illegal costs have been taxed against !hrría.

The reply was served after the time limited for its service had expired. The time for service of a reply had been extended by an order of questionable validity. But the defendant received it without objection, and retained it. This was consent to service out of time, and a waiver of the default.

E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elwood v. . the Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Kearney v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Andrews v. FriersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  2. Erdmann v. Mutual Insurance Co. of the Order of Herman's Sons of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Davies v. J. D. Wilson Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ladd v. WitteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Walbridge v. BarrettMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API