Legal Opinion

Napper v. Fitzpatrick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Docket No. 45PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Alpena; Emerick, J. Bill by Robert Napper against John E. Fitzpatrick for a decree declaring a repurchase to be a redemption of certain premises, and other relief. From a decree for defendant, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Defendant was the owner of the north half of the northwest quarter of section 33, in township 32 north, range 6 east. He mortgaged it to plaintiff on the 7th day of March, 1894, to secure the repayment of a loan of $1,200 running two years at 8 per cent. The mortgage was afterwards foreclosed, and the premises were bid in by the mortgagee for the amount due upon the mortgage, together with the expenses of sale. Defendant did not redeem the premises, and the equity of redemption expired on April 9, 1899. Following this plaintiff leased the premises to defendant for one year with the privilege…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dubois v. CampauMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Battin v. WoodsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. McCredie v. BuxtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Sorenson v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  5. Brown v. NapperMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. NieboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tyler v. BurgesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Wood v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API