Legal Opinion

State v. Gallegos

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1965No. 1327PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

Appellant Pete Gallegos was tried on three counts for the crime of illegal sale of narcotic drugs and convicted on Count Two, charging the sale of heroin in violation of § 36-1002.02, A.R.S., 1961, as amended, and Count Three, charging the sale of marijuana, in violation of § 36-1002.07, A.R.S., 1961, as amended.

As grounds of appeal, appellant assigns that a fatal defect existed in the information on which he was convicted because it fails to name the person to whom the narcotics were sold, citing Earp v. State, 20 Ariz. 569, 184 P. 942. We do not consider that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State v. SingletonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. EisensteinArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State v. PolanArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. BoagArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. LawrenceArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. PiperArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. ArriolaArizona Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API