Legal Opinion

People v. Freeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 2, 1989No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law, defendant’s motion for suppression granted and new trial granted. Memorandum: Even were we to assume that the initial stop and frisk of defendant was supported by reasonable suspicion, the subsequent actions of the officer rendered an otherwise valid stop invalid (see, People v Hicks, 68 NY2d 234, 238). In Hicks, the Court of Appeals concluded that if the conduct of the police during a stop and frisk reaches a sufficiently high level of intrusion, it would be deemed a de facto arrest. The standard for determining whether a de facto arrest has taken…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GilboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. People v. ShepherdNew York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API