Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Moran

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1970No. Crim. No. 13525Published

1DissentTraynor, C. J.

I dissent.

The trial court instructed the jury that “[i]f the intent to commit the crime did not originate with the defendant and he was not carrying out his own criminal purpose, but the crime was suggested by another person for the purpose of entrapping and causing the arrest of the defendant, then the defendant is not criminally liable for the acts so committed.” (CALJIC No. 851 (Revised).) The jury rejected the defense and found defendant guilty.

It is my opinion that the cases on which this instruction was based should be overruled (see notes 1 and 2, infra) and that the issue of…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. People v. GorgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API