Legal Opinion

Duemmel v. Ruggeri-Minster, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff was its special employee. "A special employee is described as one who is transferred for a limited time of whatever duration to the service of another” (Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553, 557). In this case, the uncontroverted facts established that plaintiff, although paid by his general employer, was injured while performing services under the control and at the direction of defendant, for the exclusive benefit of defendant. In those…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Cameli v. Pace UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Lesanti v. Harmac Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Jeras v. East Manufacturing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Levine v. PontiacAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API