Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hill v. Board of Education

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1923No. Calendar No. 30,769PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

In the case of Mathews v. Kalamazoo Board of Education, 127 Mich. 530 (54 L. R. A. 736), this court held that, where there was no case of smallpox in the district, it was beyond the power of the board to require vaccination of pupils as a condition of admission to the schools, but it was there said in the prevailing opinion written by Justice Moore:

“If the rule was that, during the prevalence of the smallpox in Kalamazoo, the child could not attend school unless vaccinated, a very different result would be reached. * * * In what I have said I do not mean to intimate that during the prevalence…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. New York Ex Rel. Lieberman v. Van De CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Zucht v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newberry v. StarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Stone v. ProbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Barber v. School BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  4. The Gym 24/7 Fitness LLC v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. in Re Certified Question (Midwest Inst of Health VMichigan Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API