Offtendinger v. Ford
Supreme Court of Virginia
Appeal from decree of hustings court of Lynchburg in an attachment suit wherein J. A. Ford and W. F. Matthews were plaintiffs, and the plaintiff in error, LI. J. Offtendinger, was defendant. Opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtHinton, J.
On the 22d day of August, 1887, the plaintiffs, J. A. Ford and ~W. F. Matthews, obtained from a justice of the peace an attachment for rent to become due, upon a complaint stating *918that “ H. J. Offtendinger intends to remove, is removing, and has removed his effects from the leased tenement aforesaid,” &c. This attachment was returned on the same day, “ Executed * * * by levying on the following property, to-wif: ” (here follows a long list of articles described by name) and then, “ the lease of the said buildiwjfor twelve months,” “ hotel and bar-room license for the city, year of 1887.”
On…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roanoke Land & Improvement Co. v. Karn & HicksonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
- Robertson v. HogeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887
3Cited by11 opinions
- Leary v. BriggsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1913
- Johnson v. Norton Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1893
- Lancaster v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
- Lancaster v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
- Lancaster v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1876
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.