Legal Opinion
Bolden v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 9, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00175Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA AMY MICHELLE BOLDEN ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No: 1:18-cv-175 v. ) ) Judge Christopher H. Steger ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security ) Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Amy Bolden seeks judicial review under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act ("Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), from her denial by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration regarding her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Act,
42 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Luther D. Mullen v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Richard G. Shepherd v. Otis Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Eddie W. ABBOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis M. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Ruby E. Heston v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Theresa E. Foster v. William A. HalterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.