Vahlsing v. Harrell
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
The suit was for a judgment declaring that plaintiff had a right to have and' maintain a suction pipe under, and to draw water therewith for irrigation from a drainage ditch on, defendant’s land.
The claim was: (1) that the drainage ditch was on defendant’s land under a valid easement granted the LaFeria Water Control and Improvement District, Cameron County No. 3, hereafter called “The District” by plaintiff’s predecessor in title; (2) that the drainage easement, included the right to construct, have, and maintain suction pipes across such easement and into said ditch…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Harrell v. F. H. Vahlsing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Central Amusement Company v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Cameron County Water Control & Improvement District No. 5 v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
- Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002