Legal Opinion

Vahlsing v. Harrell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1950No. 12827PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was for a judgment declaring that plaintiff had a right to have and' maintain a suction pipe under, and to draw water therewith for irrigation from a drainage ditch on, defendant’s land.

The claim was: (1) that the drainage ditch was on defendant’s land under a valid easement granted the LaFeria Water Control and Improvement District, Cameron County No. 3, hereafter called “The District” by plaintiff’s predecessor in title; (2) that the drainage easement, included the right to construct, have, and maintain suction pipes across such easement and into said ditch…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Harrell v. F. H. Vahlsing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  3. Central Amusement Company v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Cameron County Water Control & Improvement District No. 5 v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Marcus Cable Associates, L.P. v. KrohnTexas Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API