Legal Opinion

Carey v. Runde

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1994No. WD 49096PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FENNER, Chief Judge.

Melody D. Carey appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment on her petition in favor of Phyllis I. Runde. The trial court found that Carey’s exclusive remedy is under the Workers’ Compensation Act and dismissed her petition. On appeal, Carey contends that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment because: 1) summary judgment was not supported by evidence properly before the court; 2) there was a genuine issue of material fact; and 3) the Workers’ Compensation Act is not the exclusive remedy for Carey’s injury. We affirm.

On June 15, 1993, Carey filed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Killian v. J & J INSTALLERS, INC.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Lovelace v. Long John Silver's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Lay v. St. Louis Helicopter Airways, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Mound Rose Cornice & Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. H. Kalicak Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Chang v. ElyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API